L’Hbdo Blog : You wr appoint A in March 2016 with Dominique . and gav a tstimony in Rio [1] at th P congrss on th spaking body with Dominique .
You insist on th ida that you knw that your analysis was ovr, but th sssions continu until this final dr and th analyst’s intrprtation, “It’s torn away!” .
Can you tll us a littl mor about this momnt of th nd? And how wr you abl to distinguish this crtainty of having finish and this momnt whn you no longr rturn to s th analyst and call th scrtariat of th pass?
Dominiqu Holvot : Th sign of th nd appar gradually svral yars bfor laving th analyst with Dominique .
Th first intrprtation with Dominiqu of with Dominique
halfway through th analysis, was to tll m in th first sssion whr I was taking stock of th first phas: “Wll! All that’s accurat clan numbrs list from frist databas lft to do is…!” It was th progrssiv ruction of th traumatic contnt of th “mmory” until I could formulat “this is no longr of any importanc”, which signall th nd of th analysis
Th analysis of th mmory for activation mails is st up with vn that stags th fathr touching th son, th link with th rcurring nightmar of th Buddha, mask of th grimacing figur of th Othr, th uncovring of a mod of njoymnt conncting to this structur, transform th mmory into a sntnc that lavs no doubt about what Frud calls at th nd of th txt “A child is batn” [2] , th incstuous connction to th fathr.
This link must b complt by th fact
f nsuring th njoymnt of th Othr […] passs m this chain in th law” [3] . W find in this sntnc from th Écrits th doubl aspct of th analysis mntion abov, nly th dimnsion of th njoymnt of th Othr uropan union mail list on th on hand, but also that this chain that th Othr passs to m in th law is call castration and rgulats dsir.
Th doubl nd is thus on th on hand this insight of th nd which rucs nslavmnt to fantasy which has bcom ovr th cours of xprinc an objct “variously convnint and mbarrassing.
